Wednesday, September 3, 2014

ETEC 561 Week 2 - Theories and Models of Learning and Instruction


Epistemology is the study of how we learn and acquire new information.  Epistemology can be distinguished from instructional methods and theories because instructional methods and theories are created based on what we know of epistemology.  Instructional methods based on behavioral learning theory reinforces positive behavior and corrects negative behavior because it is centered on observed behavior.  In contrast, instructional methods based on cognitive information processing theory focuses on sensory, short-term, and long-term memories because it is believed new information can be stored for later recalled depending on how the information is received in the first place.  Clearly these two theories have differing ideas of epistemology and result in different concepts of the ideal instructional methods.  Learning theories lead to instructional methods and are designed to improve student outcomes based on how we believe students learn best.

I am a relativist.  I believe most assumptions of truth are based on the socio-economic factors by which we are effected.  Maybe it’s because I have been teaching Physics lately, but everything is relative.  I cannot think of an instance when my perspective conflicted with my instructor.  Perhaps this is a reflection of my relativist leanings.   When in Rome. . . .they say.  I have always been flexible when it comes to learning styles and have been able to learn effectively in many different environments and situations.  While I enjoy the convenience of online courses, I thoroughly enjoyed my time spent in an academic setting with fellow learners.  I realize not everyone learns well in every environment, but my educational background is incredibly varied and I think it helps me when it is my turn as the instructor.

Behaviorism focuses on behavioral outcomes and reinforcement.  Problem-solving from a behavioral approach would include breaking the problem in to smaller components with frequent checks for feedback so that correction could be given and learning could be evaluated.  Students would be guided (or corrected) to the problem’s solution and have no chance to stray too far from the anticipated path. 
Constructivism focuses on student-directed learning and higher order thinking skills with minimal instructional guidance.  This is accomplished through collaborative group work, consideration of realistic problems, and student reflection and responsibility for their own learning.  Problem-solving exercises, then, would allow students to work together to solve the problem as a whole using any and all means at their disposal.  The effectiveness of their solution would then be presented and peer-reviewed and re-worked as necessary to find the best outcome.
These different learning theories and instructional methods effect learning outcome based on teacher participation, student maturity and interest levels.  Certainly age plays an important part in the effectiveness of constructivism theory.  A mature student who is interested in science might spend all day exploring a physics lab on his own, but another student might become bored within minutes and be asleep shortly after being left to his own devices.  Student interest and the perceived value of the lesson is the primary motivation for learning in a constructivist environment. On the other hand, it could be argued the behaviorism method could teach anyone, anywhere, anything because it guides the student toward the intended goal and leaves little room for error.  Student motivation with behaviorism is positive teacher feedback and good grades.

2 comments:

  1. Hi, Hope. I loved reading your post because we have many very similar thoughts. First, I agree that epistemology is the foundation upon which we build instruction.
    Because I studied philosophy a great deal during my undergraduate study, I understand the theory that there is one universal truth; however, as an educator, I am a relativist also. I love the fact that you mention socio-economic background as being very influential as far as how our students see truth. When I think of varied perspectives, I often think of those students who struggle to survive from day to day, and I wonder what things they have been taught to believe are true. I am in the same room with them, but sometimes they are living in an entirely different world.
    Again, like you, I learn easily in a variety of settings, so whether my instructor is a behaviorist or constructivist doesn’t matter a great deal to me. I also think you are absolutely right in that age and maturity play a key role in the success of one approach over the other. I am a middle school librarian, and middle school boys have a hard time focusing on ANYTHING, much less on being able to motivate themselves in an academic setting.

    Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Hope, once again, I thoroughly enjoyed your blog. I thought your examples of differing ideas of epistemology in learning theories was very clear and well put. You do a great job here of discussing these theories adding a personal touch that brings relevance to the subject matter. My favorite part of your blog was your answer to the second question. I had not thought of how socioeconomics would play into epistemic stances, but I completely agree with you. I said that I fell more into a contextual category, but I think naturally most people fall into more of a relativist way of thinking. I believe the classroom is a great place to put some of those relativist beliefs into context, but it is also our job to encourage individual thinking and encourage life long learning. As far as problem based learning goes, I think you did a great job of looking at it from both perspectives. I think knowing your audience is key in all aspects of education and you do a great job of pointing that out.

    ReplyDelete